The Power of Prayer
- Rei
- Commander
- Posts: 3068
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:31 pm
- Title: Fides quaerens intellectum
- First Joined: 24 Nov 2003
- Location: Between the lines
It means one of two things: either you've lost it or your cat really did say something. Now, it could be that you've lost it, but if you've heard your cat speak, as has your family (who is otherwise lacking in signs of mental illness), as well as your neighbour (who does his level best to always be honest)... It may be that you have all lost it (afterall, some people look quite normal even when there're a few screws loose) or it may be that they are lying to make you feel better (even honest people may attempt to soften a blow), but, logically, it would appear that perhaps your cat really did speak. Just because you have never experienced something before and it does not match up with your current view of the world does not mean that it cannot be true or real.
Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connait point.
~Blaise Pascal
私は。。。誰?
Dernhelm
~Blaise Pascal
私は。。。誰?
Dernhelm
-
- Speaker for the Dead
- Posts: 2539
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:11 pm
- Title: Stayin' Alive
- First Joined: 17 Aug 2002
- Location: Evansville, IN
You're both right, but you're both also wrong.So what if the answer is "yes"? You can not argue the hearing of a yes, although you may argue its source. Either way, I have heard "yes" before, so that rules out your suggestion that no-one is listening.I'm suggesting that no answer does not mean "no" but rather that no one is listening.
No answer can mean nobody's listening, but it could just as easily mean that whoever is listening doesn't have an answer and decides to say nothing.
It would be nice to assume that because you got an answer one time, that someone's always listening, but there's no guarantee. It could also be that the listener was there that time, but all the times when you didn't get an answer he was absent.
The enemy's fly is down.
- Rei
- Commander
- Posts: 3068
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:31 pm
- Title: Fides quaerens intellectum
- First Joined: 24 Nov 2003
- Location: Between the lines
You are right, Chico, although either way, the occasion of a single response allows that there must be somebody who is able to listen.
And FT, I've had teachers who have just looked at me when I asked a question regarding an answer I've given them, waiting for me to think it through a little further and so that I may see the answer to my own question. It is a common enough teaching method to not answer or to answer with questions.
And FT, I've had teachers who have just looked at me when I asked a question regarding an answer I've given them, waiting for me to think it through a little further and so that I may see the answer to my own question. It is a common enough teaching method to not answer or to answer with questions.
Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connait point.
~Blaise Pascal
私は。。。誰?
Dernhelm
~Blaise Pascal
私は。。。誰?
Dernhelm
- Rei
- Commander
- Posts: 3068
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:31 pm
- Title: Fides quaerens intellectum
- First Joined: 24 Nov 2003
- Location: Between the lines
You must have posted it after I went to reply because I missed it.
I tend to suspect that there are reasons why God does not interfere every time someone is afraid to die. A Good Man is Hard to Find, by Flannery O'Connor actually addresses this, somewhat. Albeit, in a mildly twisted manner. I think that if an artist refuses to use black because he is afraid of allowing anything sad to come into the mind of those who see his work, he will not be able to create anything so beautiful as if he allowed himself to use all of the colours available. Death is tragic, but death of even a good person has led to many greater things. It is selfish to assume that I and that which makes me comfortable are the greatest priorities of a God who can see the entire tapestry and knows what colours need to be where to have the most beautiful final creation.
I tend to suspect that there are reasons why God does not interfere every time someone is afraid to die. A Good Man is Hard to Find, by Flannery O'Connor actually addresses this, somewhat. Albeit, in a mildly twisted manner. I think that if an artist refuses to use black because he is afraid of allowing anything sad to come into the mind of those who see his work, he will not be able to create anything so beautiful as if he allowed himself to use all of the colours available. Death is tragic, but death of even a good person has led to many greater things. It is selfish to assume that I and that which makes me comfortable are the greatest priorities of a God who can see the entire tapestry and knows what colours need to be where to have the most beautiful final creation.
Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connait point.
~Blaise Pascal
私は。。。誰?
Dernhelm
~Blaise Pascal
私は。。。誰?
Dernhelm
- Rei
- Commander
- Posts: 3068
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:31 pm
- Title: Fides quaerens intellectum
- First Joined: 24 Nov 2003
- Location: Between the lines
Yep, you're right. I fail to see how that's bad, though. I have no issues with leaving the time of my death in the hands of someone who loves both me and everyone in this world. I trust that He will use my death for the greatest good, just like I trust he uses the deaths of others for the greatest good.
Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connait point.
~Blaise Pascal
私は。。。誰?
Dernhelm
~Blaise Pascal
私は。。。誰?
Dernhelm
- hive_king
- Toon Leader
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:48 am
- Title: has been eaten by a bear
- Location: Sacramento, CA
- Contact:
Supposing, of course, that God DOES love everyone, an unverifiable and, in my opinion, not certain claim. If God is not omnibenevolent that opens up a whole new can of worms.
The Makeout Hobo is real, and does indeed travel around the country in his van and make out with ladies... If you meet him, it is customary to greet him with a shot of whiskey and a high five (if you are a dude) or passionate makeouts (if you are a lady).
- Rei
- Commander
- Posts: 3068
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:31 pm
- Title: Fides quaerens intellectum
- First Joined: 24 Nov 2003
- Location: Between the lines
Very true, but you know that I am working from the perspective of both God existing and Deus caritas est. Love is the definition of God in the Christian perspective. Either way, if there is a God, and He isn't defined as Chaos, I expect that there is a plan and it makes more sense to believe that that plan is for the good of the world, including our fears and pains and deaths. If I also believe that this God is omnipotent, etc., it would be a miserable existance to believe that He's also out to get us. Perhaps that is why (correct me if I'm wrong) the vast majority of religions out there believe in a God or gods who have a plan and who care for humans, especially the religions that have been around for a very long time and are still alive today.
Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connait point.
~Blaise Pascal
私は。。。誰?
Dernhelm
~Blaise Pascal
私は。。。誰?
Dernhelm
-
- Speaker for the Dead
- Posts: 5185
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:30 pm
- Title: Age quod agis
- First Joined: 04 Feb 2002
- Location: ^ Geez, read the sign.
-
- Speaker for the Dead
- Posts: 2539
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:11 pm
- Title: Stayin' Alive
- First Joined: 17 Aug 2002
- Location: Evansville, IN
-
- Soldier
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:45 am
- Location: Clinton Township, Michigan
- Contact:
God could have given us immortality. Isn't that choosing that we all die? He could have made heaven our only existence. Therefore never having the need for us to die. Seems pretty cruel to give us death. You can argue it was for our good all you want, but personally there is nothing good about death. Even if you are going to heaven.We all die. Every last one of us. It's part of being human. No decision necessary.Still leads to God deciding who lives and who dies. By answering prayers that deal with life and death.
That wasn't the point. He can decide to answer prayers of people who have life threatening wounds. Deciding whether or not to let them live longer.
A woman giving birth to twins, who is having complications prays to God that both her and her children survive. Only one child lives.
Isn't God deciding not to answer that prayer for the woman and one of her children? Therefore deciding whether they live or die?
Fight the machine!
-
- Speaker for the Dead
- Posts: 2539
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:11 pm
- Title: Stayin' Alive
- First Joined: 17 Aug 2002
- Location: Evansville, IN
- Rei
- Commander
- Posts: 3068
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:31 pm
- Title: Fides quaerens intellectum
- First Joined: 24 Nov 2003
- Location: Between the lines
God has, in that case, answered her prayer and said, "I'm sorry, but I will take one of your children to be with me." Now it's up to the woman to accept this and, while she most certainly is allowed to be deeply hurt to lose a child, rejoice in the life of the other child. I'm not saying that is an easy thing to do, but the most painful experiences can also be the ones in which we grow the most. A song I like captures it fairly well:
Blessed be Your name
When the sun's shining down on me
When the world's "all as it should be"
Blessed be You name
And blessed be Your name
On the road marked with suffering
Though there's pain in the offering
Blessed be Your name
He gives and takes away
He gives and takes away
My heart will choose to say
Lord, blessed be Your name
Blessed be Your name
When the sun's shining down on me
When the world's "all as it should be"
Blessed be You name
And blessed be Your name
On the road marked with suffering
Though there's pain in the offering
Blessed be Your name
He gives and takes away
He gives and takes away
My heart will choose to say
Lord, blessed be Your name
Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connait point.
~Blaise Pascal
私は。。。誰?
Dernhelm
~Blaise Pascal
私は。。。誰?
Dernhelm
-
- Former Speaker
- Posts: 1017
- Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 4:44 pm
- Title: Battle School Engineer
- Location: MD
- Contact:
It seems to me that the universe "with God" is no different from the universe with no god. Except, of course, that one has a god in it, and one does not.
There is no difference in how the universe responds to us, whether or not there is a God involved. If you pray--the results are no better than purely random chance (no prayer). The world is just as nasty with or without; good people die random deaths with and without. All that the "God belief" gives you is some alternate explanation (an apology) for "why."
All it does is provide comfort for some. To be honest, it also provides misery for many.
There is no difference in how the universe responds to us, whether or not there is a God involved. If you pray--the results are no better than purely random chance (no prayer). The world is just as nasty with or without; good people die random deaths with and without. All that the "God belief" gives you is some alternate explanation (an apology) for "why."
All it does is provide comfort for some. To be honest, it also provides misery for many.
--Boothby
"The biggest cause of trouble in the world today is that the stupid people are so sure about things and the intelligent folks are so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
"The biggest cause of trouble in the world today is that the stupid people are so sure about things and the intelligent folks are so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
- neo-dragon
- Commander
- Posts: 2516
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:26 pm
- Title: Huey Revolutionary
- Location: Canada
But of course, a small child realizes that his parents could let him have ice-cream and cake for dinner every day, and stay up as late as he wants. After all, there's nothing good about yucky vegetables and having to be in bed by 8:30. Parents are just random and cruel.God could have given us immortality. Isn't that choosing that we all die? He could have made heaven our only existence. Therefore never having the need for us to die. Seems pretty cruel to give us death. You can argue it was for our good all you want, but personally there is nothing good about death. Even if you are going to heaven.
- hive_king
- Toon Leader
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:48 am
- Title: has been eaten by a bear
- Location: Sacramento, CA
- Contact:
Death is not good for us. Death is the epitomee of "not good for us."
The Makeout Hobo is real, and does indeed travel around the country in his van and make out with ladies... If you meet him, it is customary to greet him with a shot of whiskey and a high five (if you are a dude) or passionate makeouts (if you are a lady).
- hive_king
- Toon Leader
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:48 am
- Title: has been eaten by a bear
- Location: Sacramento, CA
- Contact:
Since we have no evidence that there is anything after death, as far as we know death is the obliteration of self. In my opinion, obliteration of self is a bad thing, since it is the end of thoughts and experiences. And the end of BLT sandwiches.
Also, may I ask where you inferred that I knew what happens after people die from my post?
Also, may I ask where you inferred that I knew what happens after people die from my post?
The Makeout Hobo is real, and does indeed travel around the country in his van and make out with ladies... If you meet him, it is customary to greet him with a shot of whiskey and a high five (if you are a dude) or passionate makeouts (if you are a lady).
No, you may not. If you can quip one-liner questions to anything anyone says on this board, you can receive the same.Also, may I ask where you inferred that I knew what happens after people die from my post?
So you're saying that the absence of evidence is evidence of absence? I think you summed it up nicely when you said "In my opinion".Since we have no evidence that there is anything after death, as far as we know death is the obliteration of self
In this, you assume that death is the obliteration of self, despite having just admitted that it's only your opinion. Then you go on to assume that it's the end of experiences, which again, is only the absence of evidence.obliteration of self is a bad thing, since it is the end of thoughts and experiences
- hive_king
- Toon Leader
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:48 am
- Title: has been eaten by a bear
- Location: Sacramento, CA
- Contact:
Oh, very petty and immature of you, anthony. What are you, 12? You come off as quite emotionally stunted. Grow up and act like an adult.
What I mean is that since we have no evidence of the existance of an afterlife, to assume one is logically a fallacy. Logically, one should not presume there is something untill its been proven or has acumulated a fair amount of empirical evidence.So you're saying that the absence of evidence is evidence of absence? I think you summed it up nicely when you said "In my opinion".
I can't very well vouch for anyone else's opinion. Only my own.In this, you assume that death is the obliteration of self, despite having just admitted that it's only your opinion. Then you go on to assume that it's the end of experiences, which again, is only the absence of evidence.
The Makeout Hobo is real, and does indeed travel around the country in his van and make out with ladies... If you meet him, it is customary to greet him with a shot of whiskey and a high five (if you are a dude) or passionate makeouts (if you are a lady).
- neo-dragon
- Commander
- Posts: 2516
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:26 pm
- Title: Huey Revolutionary
- Location: Canada
I'm saying that you're closed minded if you can't even entertain the hypothetical possibility that next to God we are like children, and can't yet comprehend how the things that seem like arbitrary punishments to us may serve a greater purpose.So you're saying death is good for us?
The young child may not understand or believe how vegetables are ultimately good for him when all he knows is that ice-cream and cake tastes so much better.
That was seriously the best you could do?Oh, very petty and immature of you, anthony. What are you, 12? You come off as quite emotionally stunted. Grow up and act like an adult.
To "assume" that there is an afterlife IS a logical fallacy, yes - you are correct about that. However, I never assumed there WAS an afterlife - I merely pointed out that YOU assumed there WASN'T. Now, this is the important part - for the same reason as you can't assume there IS an afterlife (because there's no evidence of such) - you can't assume there ISN'T (because again, there's no evidence of such - as I said, the absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence).What I mean is that since we have no evidence of the existance of an afterlife, to assume one is logically a fallacy.
I totally agree - which is why I DIDN'T presume there WAS an afterlife.Logically, one should not presume there is something untill its been proven or has acumulated a fair amount of empirical evidence.
Return to “Milagre Town Square”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 24 guests